On 25/01/15 22:15, Matthew Brett wrote: > I agree, that shipping openblas with both numpy and scipy seems > perfectly reasonable to me - I don't think anyone will much care about > the 30M, and I think our job is to make something that works with the > least complexity and likelihood of error.
Yes. Make something that works first, optimize for space later. > It would be good to rename the dll according to the package and > version though, to avoid a scipy binary using a pre-loaded but > incompatible 'libopenblas.dll'. Say something like > openblas-scipy-0.15.1.dll - on the basis that there can only be one > copy of scipy loaded at a time. That is a good idea and we should do this for NumPy too I think. Sturla _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
