On Do, 2015-02-26 at 07:09 -0800, Jaime Fernández del Río wrote: <snip> > > > To add one of my own: the old iterator is still being used in many, > many places throughout the numpy code base. Wouldn't it make sense to > port those to the new one? In doing so, it would probably lead to > producing simplified interfaces to the new iterator, e.g. reproducing > the old PyIter_AllButAxis is infinitely more verbose with the new > iterator. > >
Might be a bit off topic. But I used to wonder if it could make sense to create a Cython code generation support for nditer? NDiter is pretty powerful, but we often have things like the contiguous special case, buffering, etc. that is always identical code but without having something ready in cython nobody will ever use nditer from cython, even though for some things it might make a lot of sense. - Sebastian <snap> > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
