On Mar 10, 2015 11:15 AM, "Paul Hobson" <pmhob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Paul Hobson <pmhob...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I feel your pain. Making it worse, numpy.random.lognormal takes "mean" and "sigma" as input. If there's ever a backwards incompatible release, I hope these things will be cleared up. >> >> >> There is a numpy 2.0 milestone ;) >> > > Is it worth submitting PRs against the existing 2.X branch or is that so far away that the can should be kicked down the road?
Not sure what you mean by "the existing 2.X branch" (does such a thing exist somewhere?), but yeah, don't submit PRs like that. Best case they'd bit rot before we ever get around to 2.0, worst case 2.0 may never happen. (What, you liked python 2 -> 3 so much you want to go through that again?)
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
