On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jaime Fernández del Río > <jaime.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This question on StackOverflow: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29394377/minimum-of-numpy-array-ignoring-diagonal >> >> Got me thinking that I had finally found a use for the 'where' kwarg of >> ufuncs. Unfortunately it is only provided for the ufunc itself, but not for >> any of its methods. >> >> Is there any fundamental reason these were not implemented back in the day? >> Any frontal opposition to having them now? > > The where= argument stuff was rescued from the last aborted attempt to > add missing value support to numpy. The only reason they aren't > implemented for the ufunc methods is that Mark didn't get that far. > > +1 to adding them now.
can you get `where` in ufuncs without missing value support? what's the result for ufuncs that are not reduce operations? what's the result for reduce operations along an axis if there is nothing there (in a row or column or ...)? Josef > > -n > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
