Does it work for you to set outer = np.multiply.outer
? It's actually faster on my machine. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:29 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Yes, I totally agree. If I get started on the PR to deprecate np.outer, > > maybe I can do it as part of the same PR? > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Sebastian Berg < > sebast...@sipsolutions.net> > > wrote: > >> > >> Just a general thing, if someone has a few minutes, I think it would > >> make sense to add the ufunc.reduce thing to all of these functions at > >> least in the "See Also" or "Notes" section in the documentation. > >> > >> These special attributes are not that well known, and I think that might > >> be a nice way to make it easier to find. > >> > >> - Sebastian > >> > >> On Di, 2015-04-14 at 22:18 -0400, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> > I am, yes. > >> > > >> > On Apr 14, 2015 9:17 PM, "Neil Girdhar" <mistersh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Ok, I didn't know that. Are you at pycon by any chance? > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith > >> > <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Neil Girdhar > >> > <mistersh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Yes, I totally agree with you regarding np.sum and > >> > np.product, which is why > >> > > I didn't suggest np.add.reduce, np.multiply.reduce. > >> > I wasn't sure whether > >> > > cumsum and cumprod might be on the line in your > >> > judgment. > >> > > >> > Ah, I see. I think we should treat them the same for > >> > now -- all the > >> > comments I made apply to a lesser or greater extent > >> > (in particular, > >> > cumsum and cumprod both do the thing where they > >> > dispatch to .cumsum() > >> > .cumprod() method). > >> > > >> > -n > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > > I'm just looking at this thread. > > I see outer used quite often > > corrcoef = cov / np.outer(std, std) > > (even I use it sometimes instead of > cov / std[:,None] / std > > Josef > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
