On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2015 5:39 PM, "Charles R Harris" <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm afraid I made a mistake uploading OSX wheels for numpy 1.10.0. > >> Using twine to do the upload generated a new release - 1.10.0.post2 - > >> containing only the wheels. I deleted that new release to avoid > >> confusion, but now, when I try and upload the wheels to the 1.10.0 > >> pypi release via the web form, I get this error: > >> > >> Error processing form > >> > >> This filename has previously been used, you should use a different > version. > >> > >> Any chance of a post3 upload so I can upload some matching wheels? > >> > >> Sorry about that, > > > > > > Yeah, pipy is why we are on post2 already. Given the problem with msvc9, > I think we are due for 1.10.1 in a day or two. Or, I could revert the > troublesome commit and do a post3 tomorrow. Hmm... decisions, decisions. > I'll see if Julian has anything to say in the morning and go from there. > > I vote that we increment the micro number every time we upload a new > source release, and reserve the postN suffix for binary-only uploads. If > this means we have a tiny 1.10.1 then oh well, there's always 1.10.2 -- we > probably won't run out of numbers :-). > The only difference between 1.10.0 and 1.10.0.post2 is that the latter is signed. Sigh. We need to capture this experience in the HOWTO_RELEASE document. Matthew, can you take care of that? Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
