On Dec 10, 2015 4:11 AM, "Andy Ray Terrel" <andy.ter...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's essentially what datashape did over in the blaze ecosystem. It
gets a bit fancier to support ragged arrays and optional types.
>
> http://datashape.readthedocs.org/en/latest/

IIUC this is a much more modest proposal, for numpy's existing dtypes that
represent subarrays.

It seems pretty harmless I guess. It's a little uncomfortable to be adding
yet another attribute to all dtypes that will only be used by one obscure
subset of dtypes, but it's no worse than a bunch of other already existing
attributes in that respect.

-n
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to