On Dec 10, 2015 4:11 AM, "Andy Ray Terrel" <andy.ter...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's essentially what datashape did over in the blaze ecosystem. It gets a bit fancier to support ragged arrays and optional types. > > http://datashape.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
IIUC this is a much more modest proposal, for numpy's existing dtypes that represent subarrays. It seems pretty harmless I guess. It's a little uncomfortable to be adding yet another attribute to all dtypes that will only be used by one obscure subset of dtypes, but it's no worse than a bunch of other already existing attributes in that respect. -n
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion