On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > > Some questions it'd be good to get feedback on: > > - any better ideas for naming it than "geomspace"? It's really too bad > that the 'logspace' name is already taken.
geomspace() is a perfectly cromulent name, IMO. > - I guess the alternative interface might be something like > > np.linspace(start, stop, steps, spacing="log") > > what do people think? In a new function not named `linspace()`, I think that might be fine. I do occasionally want to swap between linear and logarithmic/geometric spacing based on a parameter, so this doesn't violate the van Rossum Rule of Function Signatures. -- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
