I have something at lunch, so dinner would be good for me too. On Jul 13, 2016 7:46 PM, "Charles R Harris" <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Evening would work for me. Dinner? > On Jul 13, 2016 2:43 PM, "Ryan May" <rma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Nathan Goldbaum <nathan12...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Maybe this can be an informal BOF session? >>>> >>> >>> or maybe a formal BoF? after all, how formal do they get? >>> >>> Anyway, it was my understanding that we really needed to do some >>> significant refactoring of how numpy deals with dtypes in order to do this >>> kind of thing cleanly -- so where has that gone since last year? >>> >>> Maybe this conversation should be about how to build a more flexible >>> dtype system generally, rather than specifically about unit support. >>> (though unit support is a great use-case to focus on) >>> >>> >> So Thursday's options seem to be in the standard BOF slot (up against the >> Numfocus BOF), or doing something that evening, which would overlap at >> least part of multiple happy hour events. I lean towards evening. Thoughts? >> >> Ryan >> >> -- >> Ryan May >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
