https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues
From: John Ladasky <jlada...@itu.edu> <jlada...@itu.edu> Reply: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> Date: 20 July 2016 at 7:49:10 AM To: Discussion of Numerical Python <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> <numpy-discussion@scipy.org> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy set_printoptions, silent failure, bug? Hi Robert, > > Thanks for your reply. If no one disagrees with you or with me that this > is a Numpy bug, I would appreciate being directed to the appropriate page > to submit a bug-fix request. > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:41 PM, John Ladasky <jlada...@itu.edu> wrote: >> >> > Should this be considered a Numpy bug, or is there some reason that >> set_printoptions would legitimately need to accept a dictionary as a single >> argument? >> >> There is no such reason. One could certainly add more validation to the >> arguments to np.set_printoptions(). >> >> -- >> Robert Kern >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > > > -- > *John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.* > *Research Scientist* > *International Technological University* > *2711 N. First St, San Jose, CA 95134 USA* > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
