** Project changed: nunitv2 => nunit-3.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740539

Title:
  Feature request: attrbiute for controlling of test order

Status in NUnit Test Framework:
  New

Bug description:
  I'm aware that in the past similar request were rejected (for example ID: 
878856). However I'll try once again giving some rationale for this.
  Here: http://www.nunit.org/wiki/doku.php?id=dev:vision it is clearly stated: 
"support use of NUnit for integration and acceptance testing, but only to the 
extent that this support didn't interfere with our primary goal"
  Even if this would not be written all we know that NUnit is not only used for 
unit testing but for all kinds of automatic testing, for example running web 
pages (Selenium), WinForms (project White), and many other purposes.
  In general creating full setup in integration test scenario is costly. Other 
reason: 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1078658/nunit-test-run-order/2889524#2889524.
 Also good justification here: 
http://aspadvice.com/blogs/ssmith/archive/2005/04/12/1858.aspx
  In my particular test I have an integration with database: test if account 
creates, then if address for this account creates, then test if payment for 
this account suceeds, then ... (very long user case chain). While it is 
possible to create independent tests it is difficult to do, causes code 
repetition and slows down testing.
  Adding additional ordering attribute should not break primary goal: pure unit 
testing can be still possible when not using this special attribute.
  It seems for me that such an attribute would not be costly in implementation 
effort. Especially in comparison with other sophisticated NUnit functionality.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to