One additional observation: if you think the two arrays in the previous
comment should be considered equal, how do you think these two should be
handled instead?
object[] array1 = new object[2];
array1[0] = array1;
array1[1] = 1;
object[] array2 = new object[2];
array2[0] = array2;
array2[1] = 1;
These are the same arrays as above, just with the elements in the
reverse order.
And what about these two?
object[] array1 = new object[2];
object[] array2 = new object[2];
array1[0] = 1;
array1[1] = array2;
array2[0] = 1;
array2[1] = array1;
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051847
Title:
self contained item in array causes stack overflow
Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
Confirmed
Bug description:
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using NUnit.Framework;
[TestFixture]
public class Reproduction {
class SelfContainer : IEnumerable { public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{ yield return this; } }
[Test]
public void SelfContainedItemFoundInArray() {
var item = new SelfContainer();
var items = new SelfContainer[] { new SelfContainer(), item };
// work around
Assert.True(((ICollection<SelfContainer>)items).Contains(item));
// causes StackOverflowException
Assert.Contains(item, items);
}
}
Reproduced in NUnit 2.6.1
See also bug #491300
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1051847/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
