Got it: Make two set up fixtures in the same namespace. All the other variables I was investigating were red herrings. Is it supported t have two SetUpFixtures in the same namespace? If not, it wasn't apparent to me from the documentation.
Maybe the documentation should be changed from "Only one SetUpFixture should be created in a given namespace" to "Only one SetUpFixture can be created in a given namespace; if more than one fixture is specified for a namespace, <however you decide which one gets used>." In 3.0 can we lift those kinds of cardinality restrictions? It is irritating to have to merge two set up fixtures that control different resources just to satisfy a rule like that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242502 Title: Now SetUpFixture doesn't work at all Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: New Bug description: In 2.6.2, with the 2.6.2 runner, it used to be that a test suite with a SetUpFixture could not be used in flat list mode, which was no major inconvenience. Now I get that same error message no matter how I have my runner configured. This is true whether I use the 2.6.2 runner or the 2.6.3 runner. I know you aren't accepting bugs in V2. If that's really true, I'll have to go back to 2.6.2. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1242502/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
