On the topic of configuration, I don't think we need to do away with it. I
mean the way I understand the thinking behind the configuration via
swarming is that you end up with parameters for a model tuned for that
input and use case, analogous to whittling down a bunch of potential
interview candidates to the ones whose brains best match the problem space
I'm hiring for.

A small, autonomous unit doesn't need to do the swarming on it's own, but
could just have the pre-tuned model params embedded and changeable, and
swarming can be done at the manufacturer, or provided as a service to more
finely tune the embedded software. My android phone doesn't come with
everything necessary to build/package the android os, but I can get new
images from the manufacturer or build my own to enhance the functionality.



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Stewart Mackenzie <[email protected]>wrote:

> Long discussions at the dining table with Rik over whiskey on the rocks
> brought about a few things:
>
> I should wait till the next day to write this but I believe I have an
> understanding audience.
>
> * Configuration: How much of a role does configuration of regions come
> into play to compensate for no hierarchy?
>
> * Configuration: I'm starting to understand that simplification of the API
> is one thing but the reduction of the Configuration API or preferably the
> _elimination_ of configuration entirely is the jackpot. Thus doing away
> with swarming. Its impractical for a low powered 'internet of things' unit
> in the field to spawn up a particle swarm optimization to find the global
> optimum in the face of changing data. we can only find 'our' ('our' = human
> experience)  global optimum through study and experience.
>
> * Hierarchy or lack there of: Just as computer scientists shortcuts
> general AI via classical AI techniques foregoing biomimicry. So are we
> nupic'ers foregoing proper learning by encoding stuff like days of week
> into the implementation thus compensation for a lack of hierarchy?
>
> I need to stop now.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
> Stewart
>
> --
> Please excuse the typos and brevity
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to