David, None of the temporal memory implementations have ever had time as an explicit signal, as far as I remember.
- Chetan On Aug 8, 2014 10:21 AM, "cogmission1 ." <[email protected]> wrote: > >3. Naming issues related to "new Temporal Pooling", use of TP in past > discussions, code, and mailing list discussions. This has not been > addressed, and perhaps an online discussion would be better than an > email-based one (which clearly hasn't done the job). Perhaps Office Hours > is not the right forum for this; in which case we could still plan a > Hangouts-based session to debate, discuss and agree on the way forward. > > Re: > > I noticed that the actual time stamp is taken out of the new > TemporalMemory, relegating the new design to one that observes sequence > only - regardless of timing between inputs... Was wondering what the > thinking behind this was? > > David > > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> Possible ideas: >> >> 1. Geospatial encoders. I think a Q&A with Chetan and Jeff would be >> really interesting and informative. >> >> 2. Jeff's new Temporal Pooling theory. A lot of people are still confused >> about lots of this, and I feel the talks so far have been mostly exposition >> by Jeff rather than interactive. >> >> 3. Naming issues related to "new Temporal Pooling", use of TP in past >> discussions, code, and mailing list discussions. This has not been >> addressed, and perhaps an online discussion would be better than an >> email-based one (which clearly hasn't done the job). Perhaps Office Hours >> is not the right forum for this; in which case we could still plan a >> Hangouts-based session to debate, discuss and agree on the way forward. >> >> Regards >> >> Fergal Byrne >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We're having an office hour on Monday: >>> >>> >>> https://plus.google.com/b/100642636108337517466/events/c8ogadmp4n91rd8r0ve3ah9v41s >>> >>> Does anyone have any ideas about topics we should focus on? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --------- >>> Matt Taylor >>> OS Community Flag-Bearer >>> Numenta >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nupic mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT >> >> Author, Real Machine Intelligence with Clortex and NuPIC >> https://leanpub.com/realsmartmachines >> >> Speaking on Clortex and HTM/CLA at euroClojure Krakow, June 2014: >> http://euroclojure.com/2014/ >> and at LambdaJam Chicago, July 2014: http://www.lambdajam.com >> >> http://inbits.com - Better Living through Thoughtful Technology >> http://ie.linkedin.com/in/fergbyrne/ - https://github.com/fergalbyrne >> >> e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179 >> Join the quest for Machine Intelligence at http://numenta.org >> Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
