Dear Subutai I tried to run your "multiple fields example 1" from
https://github.com/subutai/nupic.subutai/tree/master/swarm_examples I ran the command run_swarm.py multi1_search_def.json --overwrite --maxWorkers 5 using the supplied JSON file and "run_swarm.py" from the "scripts" directory. I got the result: Field Contributions: { u'metric1': 0.0, u'metric2': 20.0598347434741, u'metric3': -63.85677190034707, u'metric4': -157.77883953004587, u'metric5': -153.23706619032606} Best results on the optimization metric multiStepBestPredictions:multiStep:errorMetric='altMAPE':steps=[1]:window=1000:field=metric1 (maximize=False): [41] Experiment _NupicModelInfo(jobID=1062, modelID=4815, status=completed, completionReason=eof, updateCounter=22, numRecords=1500) (modelParams|clParams|alpha_0.055045.modelParams|tpParams|minThreshold_11.modelParams|tpParams|activationThreshold_14.modelParams|tpParams|pamLength_3.modelParams|sensorParams|encoders|metric2:n_296.modelParams|sensorParams|encoders|metric1:n_307.modelParams|spParams|synPermInactiveDec_0.055135): multiStepBestPredictions:multiStep:errorMetric='altMAPE':steps=[1]:window=1000:field=metric1: 1.57090277774 So the error was only slightly improved to 1.57 (altMAPE) compared to the "basic swarm with one field" Now in the readme file, you stated you got the result: Best results on the optimization metric multiStepBestPredictions:multiStep:errorMetric='altMAPE':steps=[1]:window=1000:field=metric1 (maximize=False): [52] Experiment _GrokModelInfo(jobID=1161, modelID=23650, status=completed, completionReason=eof, updateCounter=22, numRecords=1500) (modelParams|clParams|alpha_0.0248715879513.modelParams|tpParams|minThreshold_10.modelParams|tpParams|activationThreshold_13.modelParams|tpParams|pamLength_2.modelParams|sensorParams|encoders|metric2:n_271.modelParams|sensorParams|encoders|metric1:n_392.modelParams|spParams|synPermInactiveDec_0.0727958344423): multiStepBestPredictions:multiStep:errorMetric='altMAPE':steps=[1]:window=1000:field=metric1: 0.886040768868 Field Contributions: { u'metric1': 0.0, u'metric2': 54.62889798318686, u'metric3': -23.71223053273957, u'metric4': -91.68162623355796, u'metric5': -25.51553640787998} Which gives a considerable improvement to to 0.886 (altMAPE). Note that in "Field Contributions" you get a 54.6% improvement from metric2 while in my run I only got 20.05% improvement. Can we explain this discrepancy? I think I ran your code exactly. It's important because it shows my NUPIC is not working as well with multiple fields as yours is which is especially important for the bridge project I keep going on about! I notice your output refers to GrokModelInfo, while mine refers to NupicModelInfo. John.
