A few reasons, from my perspective. 1. It doesn't seem to be meant to create applications, but for experimenting with network setups 2. It is not easy to install and get running 3. We do not own the copyright for the code
I think David Ragazzi has taken great initiative in creating NuPIC Studio, and created a very interesting toolbox for NuPIC. But we've been trying to make NuPIC easier to install, so #2 above is my biggest concern. Bundling NuPIC Studio with NuPIC would introduce more dependencies that are hard for people to install, making NuPIC harder to install as well. --------- Matt Taylor OS Community Flag-Bearer Numenta On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Michael Klachko <[email protected]> wrote: > Depending on the purpose of Nupic Studio, my next question might be: why is > it not included into Nupic binary? Why is it not the primary interface to > Nupic for new users? > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Michael Klachko >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > What is the purpose of Nupic Studio, and how does it relate to your main >> > priority ("to help users build successful applications with Nupic")? >> >> NuPIC studio is not Numenta code. It was build by David Ragazzi, a >> NuPIC committer, and he maintains the codebase. I'll let him answer >> questions about this project. >> >> Regards, >> --------- >> Matt Taylor >> OS Community Flag-Bearer >> Numenta >> >
