Yuwei, So you you are saying that at the 2nd B it should be able predict if its in the X or C sequence is that right? How does this work?
On Friday, August 7, 2015, Yuwei Cui <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chandan, > > It is not possible to disambiguate the two sequences at the highlighted B. > So NuPIC will predict both C & X at that point. However, only one of the > predictions will be confirmed at the next step. So if we are indeed in > sequence 1, it will predict only Y after X, and vice versa. > > In other words, TM handles branching temporal sequences by maintaining > predictions about multiple possible inputs until there is sufficient > disambiguating evidence. Does it make sense? > > Yuwei > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Chandan Maruthi < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Question on Synaptic Connections >> Consider 2 sequences >> >> Sequence 1: AAA*BXY*AAA*BXY*AAA*BXY* >> Sequence 2: AAA*BCD*AAA*BCD*AAABCD >> >> >> Consider the B highlighted, how does Nupic know that it is in sequence 1 >> vs sequence2 >> when the transition from A to B happens, how does it know that it is in >> the ABX sequence vs ABC. Also once it starts seeing ABX vs ABC, how does it >> know that the ABX sequence is more relavant at the moment.. >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Chandan Maruthi >> >> > -- Regards Chandan Maruthi
