Hi Thomas, thanks for interfacing with Patrick on this point. btw, would you be interested in integrating the team?
I'll leave up to Charles to check the patch. I don't know much about Tripplite protocols, but this one seems to be a variation of the existing ones (1001 and 3003, so maybe a 4004?!), which means that it could possibly be merged in the existing tripplite drivers. All in all, Charles will hopefully have comments... @Patrick: do you have a USB port too, or only a serial one? cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ 2009/11/9 Thomas Jarosch: > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: [PATCH] New to nut project > Date: Friday, 6. November 2009 > From: Patrick Levesque > To: Thomas Jarosch > > As requested, here is my patch file including all my modification to the > 2.4.1 > tarball from the web site. > > On Friday 06 November 2009 05:41:29 you wrote: >> Hello Patrick, >> >> On Wednesday, 4. November 2009 14:12:09 Levesque, Patrick wrote: >> > I have tried to support a TrippLite Internet350SER UPS using a serial >> > cable (The only connection on this model) using the 2.4 code branch. It >> > uses the Protocol 1004 from the tripplite specification that can be use >> > either used on serial or USB device. Since my device was only serial, I >> > worked only on the serial integration. Since I found nothing in >> > tripplite.c, tripplite-hid.c, tripplitesu.c to support my model, I have >> > done trippliteser.c in order to support my unit. Not all the >> > functionality are there but the core functionality is there. Since it >> > is licence as GPLv2, I just want to push back my modifs to the community >> > but really don't know the procedure. >> >> Do you know how diff/patch works? Just send your changes >> as unified diff (diff -u) to the devel list. Might be a good >> idea to prefix your mail subject with "[PATCH]". >> >> If possible, try to prevent winmail.dat attachments on the mailing list, >> so people with a normal email client can open the attachment. >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
