2011/7/8 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > On Jul 7, 2011, at 5:05 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > 2011/7/7 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > >> On Jul 4, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-maverick-x86 on Network >>>> UPS Tools. >>>> Full details are available at: >>>> http://buildbot.**networkupstools.org/public/** >>>> nut/builders/Ubuntu-maverick-**x86/builds/39<http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-maverick-x86/builds/39> >>>> >>> >>> Looks like the nutscan-snmp.h file has not been checked into the branch: >>> >>> make[3]: Entering directory `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-** >>> slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-maverick-**x86/build/tools/nut-scanner' >>> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `nutscan-snmp.h', needed by >>> `distdir'. Stop. >>> >> >> Looks like a similar problem in r3126: >> >> make[4]: Entering directory `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-** >> slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-maverick-**x86/build/tools' >> Regenerating the SNMP helper files. >> /bin/bash: line 2: >> ../../nut-2.6.0-r3126/tools/nut-scanner/nut-snmpinfo.py: No such file or >> directory > > > right, I still have not been able to find something that suits the compile > time (nut-scanner) needs while still satisfying the "dist" rules... > the issue above is due to tools/nut-scanner requiring nutscan-{usb,snmp}.h, > called from the same directory, but with a "top_srcdir" having an extraneous > "..", so not suitable for tools/Makefile.am execution. > > I'm still investigating for a solution. If someone has an idea... > > > So how does this get compiled in a non-dist situation? >
should be good now, with r3134. cheers, Arno
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
