Le mer. 11 août 2021 à 16:23, Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> a écrit :
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price <ro...@rogerprice.org> a > écrit : > > If nobody has objected after a week, then I suggest > > > > 1) Go ahead with the proposed additions > > 2) Give us a link to the new docs/nut-names.txt > > > > Hi Roger, > > thanks for your answer! > > > > I may be misreading your answer, or misunderstanding the new process, so > please bear with me. > > on 1) though I still have the power to merge PRs, I don't consider that > I'm the right person now to merge these: > > * PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1060/files > > * PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1062/files > > * PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1063/files > > @Charles Lepple and @Jim Klimov esp. your feedback is welcome > > > > on 2) the resulting new docs/nut-names.txt will the the one in git > master branch, once the above PRs are merged. > > > > If agreed, I can proceed with merging these PRs, and link back the > docs/nut-names.txt in the git master branch. > > Bonjour Arnaud, Sorry, I should have been clearer. The proposed RFC does > not > require any modification whatsoever to the NUT development process. > Nothing > changes. Whatever you did before, you go on doing. However an additional > effect is that one of the files in the docs directory, nut-names.txt, is a > Recording Document, and when the development activity changes this file, > it also > updates the RFC. > > It seems to me that RFCs by their nature are public and changes should be > publicly documented. A mailing list announcement is fine. When I said > > > 2) Give us a link to the new docs/nut-names.txt > > my idea was that a list reader would be told where the new version could > be > seen. But please do this in whatever way is most convenient to you and to > the > development process. > > Should the process include an official "Yes we have rough consensus for a > Recording Document update" from Jim? > Hi Roger, thanks again a lot for your answer and clarifications. And for your help to the NUT project. I feel ashamed to be so far from it now :D Still, I'll go ahead, merge the referenced PRs, and do an announcement here once done, pointing at the updated nut-names.txt. cheers, Arno
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser