Hello Arnaud, Am Freitag, den 06.10.2006, 09:21 +0200 schrieb Arnaud Quette: > can you now make an integration test (mge-shut, not in debug mode + > upsd + upsmon) and report back. > Note that you will need to adjust MAXAGE and DEADTIME to 20/25 seconds.
I adjusted both a bit, MAXAGE to 45 (because 25 was not enough) and
DEADTIME now to 25 (maybe I should also reduce the polling interval?)
Bit I am afraid it was not successful.
Oct 9 07:12:08 suncore mge-shut[26651]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Startup
successful
Oct 9 07:12:08 suncore upsd[26652]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Connected
to UPS [mge3000-1]: mge-shut-ttyb
Oct 9 07:12:13 suncore upsd[26653]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Startup
successful
[several manual queries via upsc]
Oct 9 07:13:16 suncore upsmon[26741]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Startup
successful
Oct 9 07:13:16 suncore upsd[26653]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Connection
from 127.0.0.1
Oct 9 07:13:16 suncore upsd[26653]: [ID 702911 daemon.info] Client
[EMAIL PROTECTED] logged into UPS [mge3000-1]
Oct 9 07:18:49 suncore upsd[26653]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice] Data for
UPS [mge3000-1] is stale - check driver
Oct 9 07:18:51 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Poll UPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed - Data stale
Oct 9 07:18:51 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice]
Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] lost
Oct 9 07:18:56 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Poll UPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed - Data stale
Oct 9 07:19:01 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Poll UPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed - Data stale
Oct 9 07:19:06 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Poll UPS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] failed - Data stale
Oct 9 07:19:07 suncore upsd[26653]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice] UPS
[mge3000-1] data is no longer stale
Oct 9 07:19:11 suncore upsmon[26743]: [ID 702911 daemon.notice]
Communications with UPS [EMAIL PROTECTED] established
> Also note that the mge-shut rewritte for 2.2 (merge with newhidups,
> which shares the same HID core) will greatly improve such kind of
> problems, since the hardware is polled too much, even for constant
> data. And I've already addressed this in newhidups. So we're more
> about finding a temporary solution to your problem, while waiting for
> the real good solution.
as we now have version 2.0.4 - how long will it take to get 2.2 out? And
plans yet?
> > Thats the way I know OSS projects. Especially if supported by hardware
> > vendors or distributors. Great!
>
> right, but what MGE does is still more an exception than the standard!
I don't want to start a meta discussion about this. We did research
about OSS and found that a lot of projects get support from hardware
vendors or distributors. Lot more than expected. So MGE is in good
company.
On the other side is a lot of hardware vendors hiding their stuff and
not let the linux developers write drivers.
Regards,
Ingo
--
"Milchreis schmeckt hervorragend, wenn man ihn kurz vor dem Verzehr
durch ein saftiges Steak ersetzt."
gefunden bei frag-mutti.de
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
