On 7/2/07, Dâniel Fraga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 08:30:01 -0400 > "Charles Lepple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please keep the list CC'd. > > I think it's better to send just to the list, right? You're > sending me a copy to my e-mail and other to the list. Is that really > necessary? When I click Reply, it will reply to your e-mail instead of > the list... If the mail comes from the list, I wouldn't need to use the > CC right?
No, we don't use reply-to editing on the list, because that makes it harder to direct replies back to just the original sender. Just hit "reply all", and you should not get any duplicates. > > Can you post the contents of ups.conf? This message means that the > > driver has not even tried to connect to the UPS. > > [tsshara] > driver = megatec_usb > port = auto > vendorid = 0483 > productid = 0035 > desc = "No Break TS-Shara" > > > Again, I don't know much about this driver, but I think you may need > > to select one of "subdriver=krauler" or "subdriver=agiler". > > If I use one of thesse options (krauler or agiler) it returns > the following: > > sudo ../bin/megatec_usb -u root -a tsshara -DD > > Checking device (0483/0035) (001/003) > - VendorID: 0483 > - ProductID: 0035 > - Manufacturer: STMicroelectronics > - Product: ST7 RS232 USB BRIDGE > - Serial Number: unknown > - Bus: 001 > Trying to match device > Device matches > Starting UPS detection process... > Attempting to detect the UPS... > Sending "Q1" command... > Wrong answer to "Q1" command. > Attempting to detect the UPS... > Sending "Q1" command... > Wrong answer to "Q1" command. > Attempting to detect the UPS... > Sending "Q1" command... > Wrong answer to "Q1" command. > Attempting to detect the UPS... > Sending "Q1" command... > Wrong answer to "Q1" command. > Attempting to detect the UPS... > Sending "Q1" command... > Wrong answer to "Q1" command. > 5 out of 5 detection attempts failed (minimum failures: 2). > Megatec protocol UPS not detected. > > And then lsusb -v (now I think ir returned what you want!): > > HID Device Descriptor: > bLength 9 > bDescriptorType 33 > bcdHID 1.10 > bCountryCode 33 US > bNumDescriptors 1 > bDescriptorType 34 Report > wDescriptorLength 29 > Report Descriptor: (length is 29) > Item(Global): Usage Page, data= [ 0x80 0xff ] 65408 > (null) > Item(Local ): Usage, data= [ 0x00 ] 0 > (null) > Item(Main ): Collection, data= [ 0x01 ] 1 > Application > Item(Global): Report Size, data= [ 0x08 ] 8 > Item(Global): Report Count, data= [ 0x08 ] 8 > Item(Global): Logical Minimum, data= [ 0x00 ] 0 > Item(Global): Logical Maximum, data= [ 0xff 0x00 ] 255 > Item(Local ): Usage, data= [ 0x01 ] 1 > (null) > Item(Main ): Feature, data= [ 0x82 ] 130 > Data Variable Absolute No_Wrap Linear > Preferred_State No_Null_Position Volatile Bitfield > Item(Local ): Usage, data= [ 0x01 ] 1 > (null) > Item(Main ): Input, data= [ 0x82 ] 130 > Data Variable Absolute No_Wrap Linear > Preferred_State No_Null_Position Volatile Bitfield > Item(Local ): Usage, data= [ 0x02 ] 2 > (null) > Item(Main ): Output, data= [ 0x82 ] 130 > Data Variable Absolute No_Wrap Linear > Preferred_State No_Null_Position Volatile Bitfield > Item(Main ): End Collection, data=none > Endpoint Descriptor: > > *** > > Does it help? Thank you! Yes. Can any of the megatec_usb driver authors compare this to their USB UPSes? -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
