On Sep 9, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Mario Lobo <ml...@digiart.art.br> wrote: > > By the constance of header and footer bytes, I think something > different is going on now.
Right, this is the resync code that @rpvelloso suggested. https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/231#issuecomment-138971923 > It still identifying as a Solis 1.0 (which is not) but at least it is > doing it on its own, without gdb. If I remember correctly, Bruno was mainly looking for OB/LB status, so he mapped the APC model to the nearest Solis model. I've CC'd him in case he has any other insights. Bruno, the mailing list thread starts here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/9306 and here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/9317 -- Charles Lepple clepple@gmail _______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
