> No, I don't think so. These are strongly related bundles of plugins. > When you change one chances are good you'll change the others, so it > makes sense to keep their code together rather than split it up. Folks > can still find all implementations of an interface in the javadoc, just > not always grouped together in the table of contents.
So, we agreed. > We could instead of calling these "misc" call them "compound plugins" or > something. We can change the package.html for each to list the > coordinated set of plugins they provide. For example, > language-identifier's could say something like, "Includes parse, index > and query plugins to identify, index and make searchable the identified > language." I plan to review all the package.html ... I will include those changes. Thanks! Jérôme
