[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-421?page=all ]
Alan Tanaman updated NUTCH-421: ------------------------------- Description: I've tested a patch for org.apache.nutch.indexer.IndexingFilters, allowing the user to state in which order the indexing filters are to be run based on a new indexingfilter.order property. This is needed when a filter needs to rely on previously generated document fields as a source of input to generate further fields. As suggested elsewhere, I based this on the urlfilter.order functionality: <property> <name>indexingfilter.order</name> <value>org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter</value> <description>The order by which index filters are applied. If empty, all available index filters (as dictated by properties plugin-includes and plugin-excludes above) are loaded and applied in system defined order. If not empty, only named filters are loaded and applied in given order. For example, if this property has value: org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter then BasicIndexingFilter is applied first, and MoreIndexingFilter second. Since all filters are AND'ed, filter ordering does not have impact on end result, but it may have performance implication, depending on relative expensiveness of filters. </description> </property> Patch will be attached to this issue by 29/12/06 was: I've tested a patch for org.apache.nutch.indexer.IndexingFilters, allowing the user to state in which order the indexing filters are to be run based on a new indexingfilter.order property. This is needed when a filter needs to rely on previously generated document fields as a source of input to generate further fields. As suggested elsewhere, I based this on the urlfilter.order functionality: <property> <name>indexingfilter.order</name> <value>org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter</value> <description>The order by which index filters are applied. If empty, all available index filters (as dictated by properties plugin-includes and plugin-excludes above) are loaded and applied in system defined order. If not empty, only named filters are loaded and applied in given order. For example, if this property has value: org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter then BasicIndexingFilter is applied first, and MoreIndexingFilter second. Since all filters are AND'ed, filter ordering does not have impact on end result, but it may have performance implication, depending on relative expensiveness of filters. </description> </property> > Allow predeterminate running order of index filters > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: NUTCH-421 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-421 > Project: Nutch > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: indexer > Affects Versions: 0.8.1 > Environment: All > Reporter: Alan Tanaman > Priority: Minor > > I've tested a patch for org.apache.nutch.indexer.IndexingFilters, allowing > the user to state in which order the indexing filters are to be run based on > a new > indexingfilter.order property. This is needed when a filter needs to rely on > previously generated document fields as a source of input to generate further > fields. > As suggested elsewhere, I based this on the urlfilter.order functionality: > <property> > <name>indexingfilter.order</name> > <value>org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter > org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter</value> > <description>The order by which index filters are applied. > If empty, all available index filters (as dictated by properties > plugin-includes and plugin-excludes above) are loaded and applied in system > defined order. If not empty, only named filters are loaded and applied > in given order. For example, if this property has value: > org.apache.nutch.indexer.basic.BasicIndexingFilter > org.apache.nutch.indexer.more.MoreIndexingFilter > then BasicIndexingFilter is applied first, and MoreIndexingFilter second. > Since all filters are AND'ed, filter ordering does not have impact > on end result, but it may have performance implication, depending > on relative expensiveness of filters. > </description> > </property> > Patch will be attached to this issue by 29/12/06 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira