[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539365 ]
Doğacan Güney commented on NUTCH-442: ------------------------------------- > make NutchDocument implement VersionedWritable instead of writable, and > delegate version checking to superclass I never quite understood how VersionedWritable is supposed to work. It only checks for a version then throws an exception. If you want your class to behave differently you have to write custom code anyway. > refactor getDetails() methods in HitDetailer to Searcher (it is not likely > that a class would implement Searcher but not HitDetailer) > use Searcher, delete HitDetailer and SearchBean > Rename XXXBean classes so that they do not include "bean". (I think it is > confusing to have bean objects that have non-trivial functionality) I agree with these three but I would like to get feedback from others before making this change. > refactor LuceneSearchBean.VERSION to RPCSearchBean We can't do this because there may be other RPCSearchBean-s besides LuceneSearchBean. So VERSION has to be redefined in every class that implements RPCSearchBean. > remove unrelated changes from the patch.(the changes in NGramProfile, > HTMLLanguageParser,LanguageIdentifier,... correct me if i'm wrong) Correct... I will send an updated patch (that also includes Java 5 ExecutorService fixes) > As far as i can see, we do not need any metadata for Solr backend, and only > need Store,Index and Vector options for lucene backend, so i think we can > simplify NutchDocument#metadata. We may implement : [...] I really don't want to make NutchDocument depend on Lucene. So I would prefer that FieldMeta doesn't depend on Lucene data structures. Because it is possible to implement a non-lucene backend (say, you might want to index to a database) > Integrate Solr/Nutch > -------------------- > > Key: NUTCH-442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442 > Project: Nutch > Issue Type: New Feature > Environment: Ubuntu linux > Reporter: rubdabadub > Attachments: NUTCH_442_v3.patch, RFC_multiple_search_backends.patch, > schema.xml > > > Hi: > After trying out Sami's patch regarding Solr/Nutch. Can be found here > (http://blog.foofactory.fi/2007/02/online-indexing-integrating-nutch-with.html) > and I can confirm it worked :-) And that lead me to request the following : > I would be very very great full if this could be included in nutch 0.9 as I > am trying to eliminate my python based crawler which post documents to solr. > As I am in the corporate enviornment I can't install trunk version in the > production enviornment thus I am asking this to be included in 0.9 release. I > hope my wish would be granted. > I look forward to get some feedback. > Thank you. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.