[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588746#action_12588746
 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on NUTCH-629:
----------------------------------------

While the patch improves fetch speed when there are lots of timeouts, the "slow 
but not slow enough" servers are still a problem.  By that, I mean servers 
whose download speed is over the threshold, which stops them from just getting 
dropped from the fetch job, but slow enough that, if they have a lot of URLs in 
the fetchlist, they still take longer to fetch from, and thus draaaaaaag the 
fetch run out.

I *think* this download speed information has to be stored in the host DB 
(NUTCH-628).  Generator could then use this information when generating the 
fetchlist.  For hosts that are slower, it would generate fewer URLs, and for 
hosts that are faster, it could generate more URLs.  In the ideal scenario, I 
think, this would result in URLs from all hosts getting fetched around the same 
time.

Does this make sense?  Is my thinking OK or is it flawed?


> Detect slow and timeout servers and drop their URLs
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-629
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fetcher
>            Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
>         Attachments: NUTCH-629.patch
>
>
> Fetch jobs will finish faster if we find a way to prevent servers that are 
> either slow or time out from slowing down the whole process.
> I'll attach a patch that counts per-server exceptions and timeouts and tracks 
> download speed per server.
> Queues/sservers that exceed timeout or download thresholds are marked as 
> "tooManyErrors" or "tooSlow".  Once they get marked as such, all of their 
> subsequent URLs get dropped (i.e. they do not fetched) and marked GONE.
> At the end of the fetch task, stats for each server processed are printed.
> Also, I believe the per-host/domain/TLD/etc. DB from NUTCH-628 would be the 
> right place to add server data collected by this patch.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to