Yeah, the DMCA says that search engines are protected under "safe harbor" provisions, but that we have to allow some form of "notice and takedown" action to occur.
Here's a good ./ post on it: http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/04/25/1746200.shtml?tid=103&tid=126&tid=188&tid=95&tid=99 Basically, search engines have to respect a notice that some copyrighted content was indexed by the site, and do some sort of filtering based on the notice. Andrew On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 23:57:20 +0200, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 25 October 2004 20:05, Jason Boss wrote: > > > [Letter from nice fella] > > > from your website zippp.net immediately. We have paid to have our > > websites copyrighted so that the information is not stored or duplicated > > or cached on other websites for this exact reason. > > I wonder why their site is in the google index and cache then... > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Nutch-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
