> > Any ideas for building protocol plugins not using the java.net.URL ? All protocol could be binded to a URL scheme. No? For instance, for imap you can refer to IMAP URL Scheme (http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2192.txt)
> 1. Why should we replace it? What is the problem with java.net.URL? > Does it reject unknown protocols? Yes, java.net.URL reject unknown protocols, but it could be easily extended: http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/protocolhandlers/ http://docs.rinet.ru/Junleashed/ch37.htm (There is a lot of resources on this subject) J�r�me -- http://motrech.free.fr/ - motrech [home] http://motrech.blogspot.com/ - motrech [blog] http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/motrech - motrech [liste] http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/frutch - frutch [liste] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
