Since we have no QA and no test group yet, what you think about we close bugs when releasing the next version?
Make that sense? I will take care of this process but need a rule to follow.
Stefan
Am 12.04.2005 um 20:06 schrieb Doug Cutting:
Stefan Groschupf wrote:I personal understand the life cycle of a issue like this: - Create an issue. - Assign an issue to a developer (optional) - Resolve a issue as soon someone start to work on this issue - Close the issue as soon the patch is in the sources
I'm used to not resolving them until they're fixed. See, e.g.:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=fields.html#resolution
If you have a test group, then they're not closed until they've been verified, but, without a test group, we just close them as they're fixed.
Does Jira have different conventions?
Doug
--------------------------------------------------------------- company: http://www.media-style.com forum: http://www.text-mining.org blog: http://www.find23.net
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
