Jérôme Charron wrote:
One more question about javadoc (I hope the last one): Do you think it makes sense to split the plugins gathered into the "Misc" group into many plugins (such as index-more / query-more), so that each sub-plugin can be dispatched into proper Group.
No, I don't think so. These are strongly related bundles of plugins. When you change one chances are good you'll change the others, so it makes sense to keep their code together rather than split it up. Folks can still find all implementations of an interface in the javadoc, just not always grouped together in the table of contents.
We could instead of calling these "misc" call them "compound plugins" or something. We can change the package.html for each to list the coordinated set of plugins they provide. For example, language-identifier's could say something like, "Includes parse, index and query plugins to identify, index and make searchable the identified language."
Doug ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Nutch-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
