[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-323?page=all ]
Stefan Groschupf updated NUTCH-323:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: MapWritableCopyConstructor.patch
Attached patch add a copy constructor to the map writable and use it in the
CrawlDatum.set methode. However there are more methods in the code where meta
data are passed from one CrawlDatum to a other, but I don't can see any risk of
concurent usage of the mapWritable there.
> CrawlDatum.set just reference a mapWritable of a other object but not copy it.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NUTCH-323
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-323
> Project: Nutch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8-dev
> Reporter: Stefan Groschupf
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.8-dev
>
> Attachments: MapWritableCopyConstructor.patch
>
>
> Using CrawlDatum.set(aOtherCrawlDatum) copies the data from one CrawlDatum to
> a other.
> Also a reference of the MapWritable is passed. Means both project share the
> same mapWritable and its content.
> This causes problems with concurent manipulate mapWritables and its key-value
> tuples.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nutch-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-developers
