Robin Haswell wrote: > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 11:59 +0100, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > >> I think that instead of running strace you should get a thread dump ;) >> strace cannot tell you what each JVM thread is doing. >> > > > I really can't do that. Our SE was supposed to be online a week ago and > we don't have an index at the moment, I need the results of this fetch > so I can index it and start producing some results. My boss will kill me > if I tell him we wasted a week of spidering because it crashed at the > last minute! >
Getting a thread dump doesn't kill the process. "kill" simply sends a signal, and Sun JVM responds to the SIGQUIT signal by producing a thread dump on stderr and continuing. I didn't say "kill -TERM" ... you shouldn't do that. -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nutch-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general
