Briggs wrote:
> Cool, thanks for your responses!
>
> Next time I should probably mention that we are using 0.7.2.  Not
> quite sure if we can even think about moving to something 'more
> current' as I don't really know the reasons to.

Ahh ... that's a whole world of difference! 0.7.2 is very different from 
0.8 and later, and offers only limited scalability.

Still, this workaround should work ok ...

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
 ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Nutch-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general

Reply via email to