Doğacan Güney wrote: >> Good catch! The patch looks good, too - please go ahead. One question: >> why did you remove the call to finishFetchItem() around line 505? > > Because it seems we already call finishFetchItem in that code path > just before the switch statement. I have opened NUTCH-495 for this, if > I am mistaken, just give me a nudge and I will send an updated patch.
Indeed, you're right - I should've checked with the base version, not just the patch. -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Nutch-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general
