Hi Jeff,

   Can you also try an nslookup for the master from the slave nodes? Does
that work properly? Also, it would be good to see the jobtracker and
tasktracker logs.

-vishal.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Kubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hadoop oddity

The other things to check would be ability to ping from slave nodes, 
correct fqdn in the slave nodes hadoop-site.xml file, correct dns setup 
for the master.

Dennis Kubes

Bolle, Jeffrey F. wrote:
> The hosts file looks fine...still only showing 1 node.  
> 
> Jeff
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Kubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 7:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Hadoop oddity
> 
> If the hosts file on the namenode is not setup correctly it could be 
> listening only on localhost.  Make sure your /etc/hosts file looks 
> something like this:
> 
> 127.0.0.1     localhost, localhost.localdomain
> x.x.x.x               yourcomputer.domain.tld
> 
> Dennis Kubes
> 
> Bolle, Jeffrey F. wrote:
>> In theory I have a cluster with 4 nodes.  When running something like
>> bin/slaves.sh uptime I get the desired results (all four servers
>> respond with their uptimes).  However, when I run a crawl only one
>> server, the host (which also acts as a slave), appears under the
> nodes
>> display.  This has happened after the primary server died and had now
>> been rebuilt.  Had anyone experienced this before or does anyone have
>> any tips as to where to begin looking for the problem.  Thanks.
>>  
>> Jeff
>>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Nutch-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nutch-general

Reply via email to