Thanks Vishal,

I have addressed your review comments in v5 of the patch here at
https://lore.kernel.org/nvdimm/[email protected]

~ Vaibhav

"Verma, Vishal L" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 18:09 +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> 
>> > > @@ -1924,9 +1940,13 @@ static void *add_dimm(void *parent, int id, const 
>> > > char *dimm_base)
>> > >          dimm->formats = formats;
>> > >          /* Check if the given dimm supports nfit */
>> > >          if (ndctl_bus_has_nfit(bus)) {
>> > > -                rc = populate_dimm_attributes(dimm, dimm_base, "nfit");
>> > > +                dimm->bus_prefix = strdup("nfit");
>> > > +                rc = dimm->bus_prefix ?
>> > > +                        populate_dimm_attributes(dimm, dimm_base) : 
>> > > -ENOMEM
>> > >          } else if (ndctl_bus_has_of_node(bus)) {
>> > > -                rc = add_papr_dimm(dimm, dimm_base);
>> > > +                dimm->bus_prefix = strdup("papr");
>> > > +                rc = dimm->bus_prefix ?
>> > > +                        add_papr_dimm(dimm, dimm_base) : -ENOMEM;
>> > 
>> > For both of the above, it would be a bit more readable to just return
>> > ENOMEM directly after strdup() if it fails, and then carry on with
>> > add_<foo>_dimm().
>> > 
>> >    dimm->bus_prefix = strdup("papr");
>> >    if (!dimm->bus_prefix)
>> >            return -ENOMEM;
>> >    rc = add_papr_dimm(dimm, dimm_base);
>> >    ...
>> > 
>> Agree on the readability part but returning from there right away would
>> prevent the allocated 'struct ndctl_dimm *dimm' from being freed in the
>> error path. Also the function add_dimm() returns a 'void *' to 'struct
>> ndctl_dimm*' right now rather than an 'int'.
>> 
>> I propose updating the code as:
>> 
>>      if (ndctl_bus_has_nfit(bus)) {
>>              dimm->bus_prefix = strdup("nfit");
>>              if (!dimm->bus_prefix) {
>>                      rc = -ENOMEM;
>>                      goto out;
>>              }
>>              rc =  populate_dimm_attributes(dimm, dimm_base);
>>          }
>
> Yes, that looks good, thanks!
>
>> 
>> > >          }
>> > >  
>> > >          if (rc == -ENODEV) {
>> > > @@ -3506,6 +3526,10 @@ NDCTL_EXPORT int ndctl_cmd_submit(struct 
>> > > ndctl_cmd *cmd)
>> > >                  rc = -ENXIO;
>> > >          }
>> > >          close(fd);
>> > > +
>> > > +        /* update dimm-flags if command submitted successfully */
>> > > +        if (!rc && cmd->dimm)
>> > > +                ndctl_refresh_dimm_flags(cmd->dimm);
>> > >   out:
>> > >          cmd->status = rc;
>> > >          return rc;
>> > > diff --git a/ndctl/lib/private.h b/ndctl/lib/private.h
>> > > index 4d8622978790..e5c56295556d 100644
>> > > --- a/ndctl/lib/private.h
>> > > +++ b/ndctl/lib/private.h
>> > > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct ndctl_dimm {
>> > >          char *unique_id;
>> > >          char *dimm_path;
>> > >          char *dimm_buf;
>> > > +        char *bus_prefix;
>> > >          int health_eventfd;
>> > >          int buf_len;
>> > >          int id;
>> > > diff --git a/ndctl/libndctl.h b/ndctl/libndctl.h
>> > > index 4d5cdbf6f619..b1bafd6d9788 100644
>> > > --- a/ndctl/libndctl.h
>> > > +++ b/ndctl/libndctl.h
>> > > @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ int ndctl_dimm_is_active(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>> > >  int ndctl_dimm_is_enabled(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>> > >  int ndctl_dimm_disable(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>> > >  int ndctl_dimm_enable(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>> > > +void ndctl_refresh_dimm_flags(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>> > >  
>> > >  struct ndctl_cmd;
>> > >  struct ndctl_cmd *ndctl_bus_cmd_new_ars_cap(struct ndctl_bus *bus,
>> > 
>> 
>

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav

Reply via email to