Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> writes:

> Hello Dan Williams,
>
> The patch 868f036fee4b: "libnvdimm: fix mishandled
> nvdimm_clear_poison() return value" from Dec 16, 2016, leads to the
> following Smatch static checker warnings:
>
>     drivers/nvdimm/claim.c:287 nsio_rw_bytes() warn:
>     replace divide condition 'cleared / 512' with 'cleared >= 512'
>
>     drivers/nvdimm/bus.c:210 nvdimm_account_cleared_poison() warn:
>     replace divide condition 'cleared / 512' with 'cleared >= 512'
>
> drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
>     252 static int nsio_rw_bytes(struct nd_namespace_common *ndns,
>     253                 resource_size_t offset, void *buf, size_t size, int 
> rw,
>     254                 unsigned long flags)
>     255 {
>     256         struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
>     257         unsigned int sz_align = ALIGN(size + (offset & (512 - 1)), 
> 512);
>     258         sector_t sector = offset >> 9;
>     259         int rc = 0, ret = 0;
>     260 
>     261         if (unlikely(!size))
>     262                 return 0;
>     263 
>     264         if (unlikely(offset + size > nsio->size)) {
>     265                 dev_WARN_ONCE(&ndns->dev, 1, "request out of 
> range\n");
>     266                 return -EFAULT;
>     267         }
>     268 
>     269         if (rw == READ) {
>     270                 if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&nsio->bb, sector, 
> sz_align)))
>     271                         return -EIO;
>     272                 if (copy_mc_to_kernel(buf, nsio->addr + offset, size) 
> != 0)
>     273                         return -EIO;
>     274                 return 0;
>     275         }
>     276 
>     277         if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&nsio->bb, sector, sz_align))) {
>     278                 if (IS_ALIGNED(offset, 512) && IS_ALIGNED(size, 512)
>     279                                 && !(flags & NVDIMM_IO_ATOMIC)) {
>     280                         long cleared;
>     281 
>     282                         might_sleep();
>     283                         cleared = nvdimm_clear_poison(&ndns->dev,
>     284                                         nsio->res.start + offset, 
> size);
>     285                         if (cleared < size)
>     286                                 rc = -EIO;
> --> 287                         if (cleared > 0 && cleared / 512) {
>                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Smatch suggests changing this to "&& cleared >= 512" but it doesn't make
> sense to say if (cleared > 0 && cleared >= 512) {.  Probably what was
> instead intended was "if (cleared > 0 && (cleared % 512) == 0) {"?

No, it is correct as written.  cleared is the number of bytes cleared.
The badblocks_clear interface takes 512 byte sectors as an input.  We
only want to call badblocks_clear if we cleared /at least/ one sector.

It could probably use a comment, though.  :)

Cheers,
Jeff

>
>     288                                 cleared /= 512;
>     289                                 badblocks_clear(&nsio->bb, sector, 
> cleared);
>     290                         }
>     291                         arch_invalidate_pmem(nsio->addr + offset, 
> size);
>     292                 } else
>     293                         rc = -EIO;
>     294         }
>     295 
>     296         memcpy_flushcache(nsio->addr + offset, buf, size);
>     297         ret = nvdimm_flush(to_nd_region(ndns->dev.parent), NULL);
>     298         if (ret)
>     299                 rc = ret;
>     300 
>     301         return rc;
>     302 }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter


Reply via email to