On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:51:15 -0700
Dave Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:

> The following lockdep splat was observed while kernel auto-online a CXL
> memory region:
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.17.0djtest+ #53 Tainted: G        W
> ------------------------------------------------------
> systemd-udevd/3334 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffff90346188 (hmem_resource_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: 
> hmem_register_resource+0x31/0x50
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffff90338890 ((node_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: 
> blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x2e/0x70
> 
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [..]
> Chain exists of:
>   hmem_resource_lock --> mem_hotplug_lock --> (node_chain).rwsem
> 
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   rlock((node_chain).rwsem);
>                                lock(mem_hotplug_lock);
>                                lock((node_chain).rwsem);
>   lock(hmem_resource_lock);
> 
> The lock ordering can cause potential deadlock. There are instances
> where hmem_resource_lock is taken after (node_chain).rwsem, and vice
> versa.
> 
> Split out the target update section of hmat_register_target() so that
> hmat_callback() only envokes that section instead of attempt to register
> hmem devices that it does not need to.
> 
> Fixes: cf8741ac57ed ("ACPI: NUMA: HMAT: Register "soft reserved" memory as an 
> "hmem" device")
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <[email protected]>
Trivial inline. I'm also fine with the version Dan posted.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>

> ---
> v4:
> - Fix fixes tag. (Jonathan)
> - Refactor hmat_hotplug_target(). (Jonathan)
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> index 1dc73d20d989..d10cbe93c3a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
> @@ -874,10 +874,33 @@ static void hmat_register_target_devices(struct 
> memory_target *target)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -static void hmat_register_target(struct memory_target *target)
> +static void hmat_hotplug_target(struct memory_target *target)
>  {
>       int nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Skip offline nodes. This can happen when memory
> +      * marked EFI_MEMORY_SP, "specific purpose", is applied
> +      * to all the memory in a proximity domain leading to
> +      * the node being marked offline / unplugged, or if
> +      * memory-only "hotplug" node is offline.

If this version goes forwards, rewrap closer to 80 chars. I guess it ended
up short in some previous refactor.

> +      */
> +     if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(nid))
> +             return;
> +
> +     guard(mutex)(&target_lock);
> +     if (target->registered)
> +             return;
> +
> +     hmat_register_target_initiators(target);
> +     hmat_register_target_cache(target);
> +     hmat_register_target_perf(target, ACCESS_COORDINATE_LOCAL);
> +     hmat_register_target_perf(target, ACCESS_COORDINATE_CPU);
> +     target->registered = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void hmat_register_target(struct memory_target *target)
> +{
>       /*
>        * Devices may belong to either an offline or online
>        * node, so unconditionally add them.
> @@ -896,25 +919,7 @@ static void hmat_register_target(struct memory_target 
> *target)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Skip offline nodes. This can happen when memory
> -      * marked EFI_MEMORY_SP, "specific purpose", is applied
> -      * to all the memory in a proximity domain leading to
> -      * the node being marked offline / unplugged, or if
> -      * memory-only "hotplug" node is offline.
> -      */
> -     if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(nid))
> -             return;
> -
> -     mutex_lock(&target_lock);
> -     if (!target->registered) {
> -             hmat_register_target_initiators(target);
> -             hmat_register_target_cache(target);
> -             hmat_register_target_perf(target, ACCESS_COORDINATE_LOCAL);
> -             hmat_register_target_perf(target, ACCESS_COORDINATE_CPU);
> -             target->registered = true;
> -     }
> -     mutex_unlock(&target_lock);
> +     hmat_hotplug_target(target);
>  }
>  
>  static void hmat_register_targets(void)
> @@ -940,7 +945,7 @@ static int hmat_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>       if (!target)
>               return NOTIFY_OK;
>  
> -     hmat_register_target(target);
> +     hmat_hotplug_target(target);
>       return NOTIFY_OK;
>  }
>  


Reply via email to