> If folk have substantive issues with the framework, I'd strongly > suggest first looking at the architecture > (draft-ietf-nvo3-arch-01.txt) and seeing whether their concern exists > there, and of so, whether the archictecture document would be a better > place to address the concern.
Does that mean that the working group would be willing to pull the architecture document back out of the RFC Editor queue for rework, should it come to that? Barry _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
