Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Kyle Rose for the SECDIR review. ** Section 1. Editorial. Consider either expanding “TOR” (which I first read as an onion routing protocol) or use the “ToR” spelling that comes from https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt. ** Section 3. Typo. s/addresss/addresses/ ** Section 4.4 The Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation [RFC8926] has been recommended to be the proposed standard for NVO3 Encapsulation. Recommended how? ** Section 4.4 The NVO3 encapsulation design team has made a recommendation in [I-D.ietf-nvo3-encap] for a control plane to: Practically, isn’t this a WG document? Shouldn’t this document make these recommendations? _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
