Hi Carl,
Many thanks for your review and conclusion.
Yes, I believe a reference to RFC5880 and a suggestion to use BFD
authentication should be added to security section. I'll post a new version
with these changes after the submission is reopened.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: CarlWallaceviaDatatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
To: sec...@ietf.org <sec...@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve....@ietf.org
<draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve....@ietf.org>;last-c...@ietf.org
<last-c...@ietf.org>;nvo3@ietf.org <nvo3@ietf.org>;
Date: 2023年07月11日 18:25
Subject: [nvo3] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-11
Reviewer: Carl Wallace
Review result: Ready
The draft describes the use of the BFD protocol with Geneve tunnels. The draft
is well-written and clear. As someone not familiar with either BFD or Geneve I
had one question. The security considerations section references RFC8926 but
not RFC5880. Should it reference RFC5880? In particular, the authentication
mechanisms in 5880 seem potentially worth mentioning, even if only to discount
their use.
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
