Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Carl Wallace for the SECDIR review. ** Section 6 The BFD introduces no security vulnerabilities when run in this manner. Considering Geneve does not have any inherent security mechanisms, BFD authentication as specified in [RFC5880] is recommended to be utilized. Consider if a normative “RECOMMENDED” is appropriate for encouraging the use of BFD authentication. _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
