Hi Tero, Thanks for these corrections. I have edited them into my working copy and will upload them with the next revision.
Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:17 PM Tero Kivinen via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Tero Kivinen > Review result: Has Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat > these comments just like any other last call comments. > > This document is the result of the design team chartered to work on the > common encapsulation that addresses the various technical concerns. It > does this by comparing three encapsulation protocols: Geneve, GUE, and > GPE. > > The security considerations section say: > > This document does not introduce any additional security constraints. > > Which is true, as the document does not review the security (or lack of it) > in the encapsulation protocols, but section 6.2.2 do discuss about > security/integrity extensions. It also recommends that the "the WG work on > security options for Geneve." > > Nits: > > Typo in section 6.4: > > /svailable/available/ > > Invalid capitalization of IPsec in section 6.2.2 (twice) and once in > section 7. > > /IPSEC/IPsec/ > > > > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
