I support this document being published as a standards track document.

To that effect:

  *   The status in -00 is still Informational, should it be updated to 
Standards Track?
  *   The new Section 8.2 defines “sixteen flag bits” + 16 Reserved, 8 Reserved.
This is at odds with the field sizes in Section 5 (8 Flags + VNI + 24 Reserved 
+ 8 Reserved)

Additionally a few nits:

  *   The 802 references are rendering as “_02.1X” (underscore?)
  *   The alignment of bit headers in the figures 1 & 2 is off
>From the XML looks like it was pulled into a bullet-list instead of the figure 
>itself

Regards,
Luc André

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  [email protected]  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, June 6, 2025 at 08:06
To: NVO3 <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, 
nvo3-chairs <[email protected]>
Subject: [nvo3] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00
This email begins a working group last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis-00 - 
Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying 
Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over Layer 3 
Networks<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-rfc7348bis/>

Please review the draft and send any comments to the NVO3 mailing list, 
particularly if you do or do not support this draft being published as a 
standards track RFC.

An IPR poll was conducted as a part of the very recent adoption poll for the 
draft. However, if you have subsequently become aware of any IPR that was not 
previously declared, please respond.

There are no IPR disclosures published on the datatracker against either this 
draft or RFC7348, and I received no IPR disclosures during WG adoption.

This WG last call closes on Monday 23rd June 2025.

Best regards

Matthew
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to