Yeah -- it'd be rude to just crib everyone else's code & not offer my own up for ridicule.
2008/10/22 Paul Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 22 Oct 2008, at 15:31, Francis Fish wrote: > > > Small point, and I'd have to check, but I don't think it *has* to > > start from 1, any pair of positive integers will do. But if it > > didn't it would invalidate your predicate, unless you add an > > argument to the method. > > > > It's a critical point, if true. It would mean the relationship with > the golden ratio wouldn't work for starters. > > I've always assumed that it was 1, 1, etc. however Wikipedia says here: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number > > "The first number of the sequence is 0, the second number is 1, and > each subsequent number is equal to the sum of the previous two numbers > of the sequence itself, yielding the sequence 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, etc." > > So, my spec is wrong, but so is yours. :-P > > As an additional exercise then, let's see the output being from 0 and > by default start with 0 and 1, with the option of being able to set > them to higher values for Francis. > > Who is playing then? Anyone? Peer review is a critical part of > becoming a better programmer you know... > > -- > Paul Robinson > > http://vagueware.com :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: +44 (0) 7740 465746 > > Vagueware Limited is registered in England/Wales, number 05700421 > Registered Office: 3 Tivoli Place, Ilkley, W. Yorkshire, LS29 8SU > Correspondence: 55 Velvet Court, Granby Row, Manchester, M1 7AB > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
