A good point and one worth noting, ive fixed a few old gems no-one touches anymore just because im now using them on 1.9, but there could be things im missing i guess.
But kudos. Alex On 22 Oct 2009, at 00:43, Caius Durling wrote: > > On 17 Oct 2009, at 00:31, Alex Barlow wrote: > >> also note, ruby 1.9.1's syntax is different, thus throwing many gems, >> if you do not need it, do not use it until it is supported.. > > > Erm, how are gems going to be updated unless people run it? On a local > machine, that advice doesn't really make sense to me. Production > machines, totally agree. > > C > --- > Caius Durling > [email protected] > +44 (0) 7960 268 100 > http://caius.name/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
