Out of interest, what's the purpose of the "no on-list replies" rule? Just to prevent the embarrassment of people replying with their CV to a public list? If so, seems a bit of a sledgehammer:
In other tech communities I'm in, being able to discuss jobs can be a fantastic way to improve the power differential between techie and employer -- "oh, they've advertised that job before but for different salary", or "oh, they're good guys!" (or the opposite). In this case, the employer can be directed to post to a specific "jobs" list which is syndicated to the subscription-only list for discussion. Best, Hakim On 30 October 2015 at 06:29, Tekin Suleyman <[email protected]> wrote: > A quick reminder that the job posting guidelines have guidelines for > members too. Specifically, no on-list replies to job posts please: > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!topic/nwrug-members/pkCjJAhCRwI > > Tekin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "North West Ruby User Group (NWRUG)" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "North West Ruby User Group (NWRUG)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
