Thanks for shooting that down - I did wonder about the "802.1x
compatible NIC" bit, but I just don't know enough about this stuff :(

Message: 7
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:29:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Kevin Arima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nycwireless] RE: nycwireless digest, Vol 1 #701 - 1 msg

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Peter Frishauf wrote:

> Interesting article from Pen Computing.....
>

Quick synopsis: He doesn't know WTF he's talking about.

> Is your PDA with integrated WiFi already obsolete?
> by Jonathan A. Zdziarski
>
> In 2001, IEEE began development of a protocol called 802.1x. 802.1x
runs on
> top of 802.11 and provides port-based authentication services to
existing
> wireless networks allowing for secure password authentication, dynamic
WEP
> keys, even VPN capabilities. 802.1x uses a protocol called 'EAP' short
for
> Enhanced Authentication Protocol. As of December 2002, many
corporations
> (including Microsoft) and colleges (including MIT and Georgia College
&
> State University) have implemented the 802.1x protocol on top of their
> existing 802.11 wireless infrastructure to secure their wireless
networks.
>

VPN capabilities has nothing to do with 802.1x.  802.1x provides
authentication.  What the AP or anything else does after being
authenticated has nothing to do with each other.

> You might think, "Great, wireless is finally getting more secure!" The
catch
> is that 802.1x isn't merely a software protocol. In order to log onto
a
> wireless network using 802.1x, you must have an 802.1x compatible
wireless
> card, a feature that we haven't found on any of this year's WiFi PDAs.
While
> PCMCIA cards for laptops supporting 802.1x are in no short supply,
802.1x
> won't make its way into the PDA world until January 2003, when two
software
> manufacturers (Funk Software and Meetinghouse Data Communications)
release
> their versions of 802.1x clients for PocketPC to complement the new
802.1x
> compatible CF (Compact Flash) cards to hit the market. This is all
scheduled
> around Microsoft's latest release of the PocketPC operating system
designed
> to include 802.1x support. Nevertheless, PDA manufacturers continue to
> produce PDAs with integrated WiFi knowing full well that by this time
next
> year, owners of these PDAs will not be able to log onto most corporate
or
> college wireless networks.
>

You have to have a 802.1x compatible NIC?  LOL.  That's a load of FUD if
I
ever heard one.  Now, if he said that WPA/TKIP isn't going to be
compatbile with the current WEP cards, that I could believe.

> While raw 802.11b wireless will still be the affordable standard for
home
> networks, there is little doubt that 802.1x's secure authentication
features
> will be implemented just about everywhere else. Having been developed
by
> IEEE, the same organization that created the 802.11b standard, the
protocol
> has already been widely accepted by the engineering community.
Companies
> such as Cisco and 3Com have already embraced 802.1x and designed new
routers
> and networking hardware to depend on it. Microsoft's Windows XP
Operating
> System utilizes 802.1x to provide 'Network Login' capabilities on
secure
> infrastructures. 802.1x has already worked its way into many
corporation and
> campus settings and is continuing to grow to be just as popular as
802.11
> itself.
>

I'm in the middle of discussing 802.1x with a guy who's in the commitee
for 802.1aa.  802.1aa "fixes" many issues within 802.1x, and if you are
using WPA, it apparently uses 802.1aa draft specs right now.

> Unfortunately due to the name IEEE has given this protocol, which in
my
> opinion was a big mistake, many people misunderstand the term 802.1x
> thinking that the 'x' is a wildcard for any 802.11b compatible card.
> Manufacturers naturally aren't going to highlight their lack of 802.1x
> support, as their job is to push PDAs. This has left the consumer with
> virtually no knowledge of the importance of 802.1x support.
>

I'm sure he doesn't like 802.3u, or 802.3ab either.  Too confusing.  As
I
said before, 802.1x has NOTHING to do with 802.11.  It just so happens
to
be a (somewhat) decent authentication method to securely provide a
dynamic
session key, as long as you can properly deal with the PKI (which I
apparently can't)...

> Jonathan A. Zdziarski is president of Atlanta-based Network Dweebs
> Corporation that provides real-time messaging solutions, open-source
tools,
> and professional software design services. His company is also working
on a
> freeware OpenNAP (napster) client for Pocket PC (see screenshots of
> OpenNAPCE) and other corporate Pocket PC software tools.
>

Ahhh, a president.  No wonder it's full of FUD and misinformation...

Remember boys and girls, the higher up in title you go, the less you
know.

Kevin "Starfox" Arima
(World Dictator in training)

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to